Rama killed valli in hiding is that right? The protector of Dharma itself does not walk the path of Dharma !! How can it be true , how come Rama with all his prowess kill some one in hiding
Below are the various justification
Rajaji's view
Owing to the protective virtue of Indra's necklace, Rama could not have met Vali face to face and vanquished him, just as Ravana could not be conquered by the gods. Rama could kill Vali only when himself unseen. And still the question stands, why should Vali have been killed at all?
Perhaps the answer is to be found in what Kabandha said to Rama in gratitude for being released from his curse. "Through Sugriva's friendship you will recover Sita," Sugriva's help not Vali's. And so Rama went in search of Sugriva, found him and pledged his friendship and consecrated it by fire. Sugriva had committed no unforgivable offence against Vali. Yet Vali, with his supernatural strength, persecuted his brother. Hearing the latter's complaint, Rama had pledged his word to kill Vali and restore to Sugriva his wife and make him king as his part of the contract of alliance. Thereafter, Rama had no alternative. To kill Vali from cover became an inevitable necessity. Rama erred in running after the magic deer to please his wife.
Consequent on this, difficulties and sorrows and conflicts of duty pursued him. If we keep in mind that when God takes a lower and limited form by His own ordinance, limitations follow and we should not be confused thereby. This is my humble view as against other explanations propounded by the pious.
Perhaps the answer is to be found in what Kabandha said to Rama in gratitude for being released from his curse. "Through Sugriva's friendship you will recover Sita," Sugriva's help not Vali's. And so Rama went in search of Sugriva, found him and pledged his friendship and consecrated it by fire. Sugriva had committed no unforgivable offence against Vali. Yet Vali, with his supernatural strength, persecuted his brother. Hearing the latter's complaint, Rama had pledged his word to kill Vali and restore to Sugriva his wife and make him king as his part of the contract of alliance. Thereafter, Rama had no alternative. To kill Vali from cover became an inevitable necessity. Rama erred in running after the magic deer to please his wife.
Consequent on this, difficulties and sorrows and conflicts of duty pursued him. If we keep in mind that when God takes a lower and limited form by His own ordinance, limitations follow and we should not be confused thereby. This is my humble view as against other explanations propounded by the pious.
Valmiki Ramayana View
In valmiki ramayana when valli after being hit by rama arrow goes on a spree of quesstions and questioning rama on how he can kill some one who is faced away in battle ie( killing someone from the back) and that he has done no harm to rama and he is monkey eating fruits and living in forests and he also tells rama that he would have brought ravana by his neck if he had asked him and goes on on but rama replies to him saying that valli acted unjustly and abused sugreeva's wife and that the law of the manu dictates if the king punishes the guilty the guilty will enter heaven absolved from sin but if the king does not punish the guilty , the king will bear the bolt of the sin comitted by the guilty at that time Bharata was the king and rama his brother was doing only what the king should do plus valli is just an animal and when u hunt u kill animals in hiding and its the nature of hunt and hence Rama justifies killing Valli
No comments:
Post a Comment